teaberryblue: (Default)
teaberryblue ([personal profile] teaberryblue) wrote2010-09-14 01:59 pm

Notes on the MTA Hearing

Last night, I went to the MTA’s public hearing on the new fare increases that they wish to levy specifically on regular commuters and the disabled.

If you’re not from New York, it bears explaining that New York has an awesome transit system. It’s open 24 hours a day. But in the past couple years, there have been a lot of service cuts, resulting in lost jobs, less accessibility for the disabled, and overcrowded subways. The fare also increased from a flat $2 to $2.25 per ride.

Recently, the state cut promised MTA funding, which is pretty screwy. But the MTA’s response, rather than applying for federal stimulus funds, like several other cities have done recently, is that they’ve decided to increase the monthly fare for commuters by eleven percent, and institute a service cap of 90 rides. That means that anyone who works two jobs, goes to school, or has to use transit as part of their working day (like social services folks who pay house visits) would be plum out of luck. They proposed an “alternative” by which the increase would be seventeen percent and the fares would stay unlimited. Neither is tenable, and it punishes the people who use the subway most and who are most dependent on the subway– city-dwelling commuters who can’t afford to keep cars, or choose not to keep cars.

In addition to this, the city wants to raise the fare for our service bus system, “Access-A-Ride,” a special system for elderly and disabled people that will pick them up at home and drop them off where they need to go. It’s intended to make sure that everyone can get to their doctors, and to prevent people from being forced to become shut-ins. The problem is that the people affected by this are people who more often than not are on a fixed income and have to figure their bus fare into their income very carefully already.

Being at the hearing was incredibly depressing. The room was only about a third full, and many of the people who spoke said that they had been coming to hearings like this for six years, and every time they come, the crowd gets smaller and smaller as it becomes more and more apparent that the MTA board does not give a shit about anything anyone has to say. On top of that, the number of older people and disabled people who came out to speak about how they are afraid that raising the Access-A-Ride fares will cut them off from living a normal life, or even from seeing their doctors, was downright heartbreaking.

I scribbled down some of the most interesting moments of the meeting, of people getting up to speak to the board.



Mirrored from Antagonia.net.

[identity profile] i-smell-apples.livejournal.com 2010-09-14 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh that's bitchy! And I didn't think of monthly passes, lol. I was wondering how if you bought a ticket each day they could police it! That's really stupid though. Beyond stupid!

In Melbourne, there are weekly tickets (unlimited rides for seven days), five-by-daily tickets (one ticket that can be used five times for a day fare, days don't have to be consecutive) and ten-by-two-hourly tickets (one ticket that can be used ten times for a two hour fare, same deal as five-bys) and those three are all the same price. Kind of makes sense for them to bring in a 90-ride ticket as well as the unlimited monthly one or something... but then that might be too nice!

[identity profile] zia-narratora.livejournal.com 2010-09-14 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, if the ninety-ride were a cheaper alternative to the monthly where both were offered, I would be like, hey, sure! But that isn't the case!

What is a day fare or a two-hour fare? We don't have fares by time here like that, I don't think.

[identity profile] i-smell-apples.livejournal.com 2010-09-15 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)
A daily ticket is one that's good from whenever you first validate it until the last service that night, unlimited rides on buses, trains and trams. So if you take the tram to and from work, you'd need a daily ticket.

The two hour one is only valid for two hours, so if you just got the tram to OR from work and that was it, then that's all you'd get. It's also valid for unlimited rides during that time on anything... and it's also awesome because it isn't a strict two hours, it rounds up to the next hour and then adds two. So a ticket validated at 11:59 will round up to 12 and be valid until 2, but a ticket validated on the dot of 12 will round up to one and be valid until 3. ;) And if you validate after 6pm then they're also valid until the last service. They also used to have a short trip ticket, which was only valid for one single journey of three train stations, or ten tram stops, so I'd get that to and from school. Then they abolished it which was STUPID because suddenly when I finished work late, I'd have to get a two-hour ticket for a five minute journey. (I walked home other days but didn't really want a 45-minute walk when it was late and dark.) However, in this case I did the Australian thing of just not getting a ticket, lol. You'd be daft to try that on a train, but it's fair to say that half the people on a tram at any given time won't have a ticket.

/epic

[identity profile] selfunderstared.livejournal.com 2010-09-15 08:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, we do have the 1-day unlimited, which is $8.25, so I guess that's similar?
The other thing that makes me think of is the LightRail over in New Jersey- I'm used to the Hudson-Bergen one, but there's one in Newark that's run the same way- which runs off of the honor system and once your ticket is stamped it's good for 90 minutes. (One ticket is $2.10.)